![]() ![]()
Unlike the default web view, some of these tools help to inspect the semantic content of non-trivial merge nodes. There are add-on history browsers such as "hg view" and TortoiseHg. Mercurial provides nice web presentation of incoming changes with a digest of log entries this also includes RSS/Atom news feeds. This gives some freedom for experimentation without affecting anybody else. Most other operations are local to the user's repository clone. The "fetch" extension includes useful sanity checks beyond raw "pull" / "update" / "merge", although it has lost popularity in recent years. The effect of the critical "pull" / "push" operations can be tested in a dry run via "incoming" / "outgoing". It is much easier to inspect and amend changesets routinely before pushing. There are special tools to manipulate repositories via non-monotonic actions (such as "rollback" or "strip"), but recovering from gross mistakes that have escaped into the public can be hard and embarrassing. Regular Mercurial operations are strictly monotonic, where changeset transactions are only added, but never deleted or mutated. This additional freedom demands additional responsibility to maintain a certain development process that fits to a particular project. See also Mercurial offers some flexibility in organizing the flow of changes, both between individual developers and designated pull/push areas that are shared with others. This means plain versioning without the legacy of SVN and the extra complexity of GIT. Tortoisehg tag vs bookmark code#Build documentation (bash shell commands): isabelle/bin/isabelle build_doc -a isabelle/bin/isabelle doc system Introduction - Mercurial belongs to source code management systems that follow the so-called paradigm of "distributed version control". Run application: #start Prover IDE and let it build session image isabelle/bin/isabelle jedit -l HOL #alternative: build session image separately isabelle/bin/isabelle build -b HOL 5. Switch repository to particular version (bash shell commands): #latest official release isabelle/Admin/init -R #latest version from repository server isabelle/Admin/init -u #latest version from local history isabelle/Admin/init -u -L #explicit changeset id or tag (e.g. Initial repository clone (bash shell commands): hg clone isabelle/Admin/init 3. Tortoisehg tag vs bookmark install#"brew install mercurial" or download from (c) Windows: use Cygwin64 with packages "curl" and "mercurial" (via Cygwin setup-x86_64.exe) 2. "sudo apt install curl mercurial (b) macOS: e.g. Platform prerequisites: ensure that "curl" and "hg" (Mercurial) are installed (a) Linux: e.g. So we now have the challenge, this is all very possible IMO.Important notes on Mercurial repository access for Isabelle = Quick start in 30min - 1. Tortoisehg tag vs bookmark registration#Some search, bug reporting and registration interfaces would also be useful. Additional info would be version data I reckon. You could also push back requests and updates for a toolkit.Ī nice user interface for this would be a palette of toolkit repos that you can include into your project and this needn't be much different than the palette view currently available. The VIs will from all the linked repos will be checked out as you would normally checkout a project, but there will be notifications if a toolkit can be updated. So for now let's talk just about a repo and external links to other repos.Ī project will have links to a version of a toolkit, dependency or library (including a hash number for traceability). The presentation that filled me with enthusiasm at CSLUG was given by Greg Payne and he talked about was Git Submodules (SVN External Items may also work). Tortoisehg tag vs bookmark manual#
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |